I just got back from “Curriculum Night”—an annual tradition at my children's elementary school where parents sit in uncomfortably small chairs in overheated, cheerily decorated classrooms to hear from teachers about what our children will be learning this year. Starting in third grade, we also hear about preparations for our state testing, the MCAS. As my oldest is now in fourth grade, I listened keenly to hear how much of the year was devoted to test prep, as well as for all the other ways he will be evaluated.
I was pleasantly surprised to learn that the kid who spent hours in the kitchen this summer playing “mad scientist”—randomly mixing ingredients just for the fun of seeing what happens—has a teacher who can’t wait to get to the science units. Mrs. C plans to have them working in groups, “getting dirty and messy” with guppies, pill bugs, and earthworms. But by the end of the long night, I found myself wondering: Somewhere between state testing and engaging science modules, do either Mrs. C or I know whether we’re encouraging skills that will still be in demand when my son becomes an adult?
In my position at JFF, our organization's focus on the future of work always leads me to the critical role of the future of learning. Or, as we like to say, “the future of work depends on the future of learning.” As the demands for skills evolve and change, our K–12 systems must be ready to meet them.