For sites interested in implementing short-term credentialing programs in the tech field, MCC’s preexisting infrastructure proves they must first focus on building a robust system capable of guiding learners through the program at every touchpoint and throughout the program’s duration.
A Lesson in Funding for Future Iterations of RITEI
We’d be remiss not to acknowledge that the resources needed to create such expansive programs are not equal across all implementation sites. With adequate funding to address “behind-the-scenes” needs, it's easier to be successful in programming. Future iterations of RITEI should prioritize building and budgeting the infrastructure for supportive services. Doing this is no small feat, as programs often must braid multiple streams of funding from federal, state, and philanthropic sources to ensure that participants have access to a robust set of supportive services.
But such a high learner interest in RITEI at MCC thus far suggests the program is addressing an unmet need. MCC’s example indicates that pulling from several sources could help fund these vital wraparound services. “What MCC has learned over the duration of the last three years (and continuing forward) is that the cost of education and training is a huge barrier for our community,” Gibbs says. “MCC utilizes braided funding to make education and training accessible to everyone in our community.”
These strategies are proving to be effective in building the holistic, barrier-breaking supportive service infrastructure for tech programs:
- Prioritize evaluation and research to identify the most pressing barriers in your community. While some barriers are common across all regions and demographics, additional examinations can help picture your typical learners and determine the training programs and supportive services that will best equip them to complete the program and find a job. In the case of MCC, most of its RITEI learners qualified for additional financial assistance, so the institution offered learner-centered, holistic services they knew would benefit their learners most, such as an equipment loaner program and help with rent, transportation, interview attire, and more.
- Partner up. Organizations should proactively seek partnerships with local nonprofit organizations, technical education sites, and workforce development and mentorship programs to expand their reach and meet the needs of a wide range of learners. For example, /dev/color partners with organizations in local communities to promote peer mentoring to support Black IT professionals, boost their sense of belonging, and build social capital within the Black technologist community.
- Supplement with federal funding. Mirroring MCC’s braided funding example, sites can ramp up supportive services using various funding sources. In its Supportive Services in Job Training and Education Review, The Institute for Women’s Policy Research lists several federal funding opportunities that sites can leverage, like the Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act (WIOA), the largest source of federal funding for job training activities, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Employment & Training (SNAP E&T).
Once we address the apparent needs alongside the latent ones, we can truly begin to advance accessibility, equity, and inclusivity in tech.
Connect with JFF—and RITEI
Stay connected to this work to learn more about the strides RITEI is making in inclusive tech.
Sign up below to receive research briefs, information on implementation lessons, and invitations to public events and webinars, or to connect with RITEI sites to learn more about how to get involved in local implementations in Denver, Philadelphia, Omaha, Dallas, and San Francisco.
And be sure to follow JFF on LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook.