Toward an Empirically Grounded Understanding of Student-Centered Learning Implementation: Investigating Implementation and Outcomes
Education Development Center
The Education Development Center is conducting a mixed-methods study in partnership with 10 Maine school districts. The aims of the study are to quantitatively characterize profiles of student-centered learning (SCL) implementation by leveraging student feedback survey data and investigate the relationship between implementation and student outcomes. We will focus specifically on how this relationship may differ according to student economic need and prior achievement. The qualitative component of the study will go deeper to situate quantitative findings within state, district, and school contexts for three participating districts. Quantitative results will inform the selection of sites for qualitative data collection. Study data will include responses on the Competency-Based Learning Survey for Students and student-level administrative data from all students in grades 9–12, along with data from interviews, focus groups, and document review in three districts.
Funding provided by the Nellie Mae Education Foundation
Learning with Others: An Exploratory Study of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Experiences and Outcomes Associated with Collaboration in Student-Centered Classrooms
American Institutes for Research
Research indicates that collaboration may be a particularly important feature of student-centered learning for meeting the needs of traditionally underserved students, yet racial/ethnic differences in students’ experiences of collaboration are an aspect of personalized learning that is often overlooked. The American Institutes for Research (AIR) Learning With Others study examines the role that collaboration plays in the personalization of learning within student-centered classrooms and associated outcomes for Grade 9–12 students from varying racial/ethnic backgrounds, particularly those who identify as Black. This study will address three questions: (1) How are students’ experiences of collaboration related to student outcomes? (2) To what extent do opportunities for collaboration, classroom experiences, and outcomes, as well as relationships between among factors, differ by race and ethnicity? (3) What contextual, school-level factors do teachers identify as helping or hindering their ability to provide opportunities for collaboration in diverse student-centered classrooms? To address our research questions, we will collect in-depth student-, teacher-, and classroom-level data from four to six student-centered high schools that employ personalized learning approaches, offer regular opportunities for collaboration, and serve a racially diverse population of students, including at least 25% students who identify as Black.
Funding provided by the Nellie Mae Education Foundation
Implementing and Measuring the Effects of Student-Centered Learning Practices Via a Networked Improvement Community
American Institutes for Research
AIR and New Tech Network are partnering to study teacher practices that support the development of student agency. Four New Tech Network schools will participate in a Networked Improvement Community (NIC) to design, test, and revise these teacher practices. The goal of the NIC will be to develop a menu of effective teaching practices that promote key elements of student agency, such as self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and persistence. This project will also examine how measures of student agency are related to students’ academic outcomes and whether these relationships are similar across students from different racial/ethnic backgrounds.
Co-funding provided by the Nellie Mae Education Foundation and Overdeck Family Foundation
“I’m Just Not a Math Person”: Student-Centered Approaches to Improving Mathematical Agency
High Tech High Graduate School of Education
The High Tech High K–12 schools and the High Tech High Graduate School of Education have partnered with middle and high schools from four districts across the County of San Diego to improve student agency and learning outcomes in math—particularly for students from traditionally marginalized groups. This community will use improvement science as a framework for testing, refining, and spreading “high-leverage” practices that reframe mathematical struggle as learning, engage students in collaborative problem-solving, shift mathematical discourse to be more student centered, make mathematical thinking visible, and develop student-led assessment structures that promote a growth mindset.
Co-funding provided by the Nellie Mae Education Foundation and Overdeck Family Foundation
Robust and Equitable Measures to Identify Quality Schools
Urban Institute
On behalf of JFF, the Urban Institute is conducting a feasibility study designed to move beyond traditional test-score measures to build an authentic definition of quality comprehensive public high schools that are serving high-needs student populations. The project intends to investigate if it would be possible to identify quality schools at a multi-state or national level based on a range of meaningful measures using currently available data. The feasibility study is also investigating if it is possible—after identifying quality public schools based on robust and equitable results indicators—to locate specific policies, programs, practices, and/or other characteristics of the schools that promote those promising results. In this way, the project takes a reverse-engineering approach that first captures which schools are producing strong outcomes and then investigates within those schools how they achieve at that level, particularly with marginalized populations. This approach would require not only good outcome data but also good data about what happens in the school building. If current data sets and widely used instruments cannot support this approach, the project will determine what data infrastructure and research methods might be necessary to conduct this type of research in the future.
Funding provided by: Barr Foundation
